Comparison of How Aristotle and Machiavelli essay Introduction Both Aristotle and Machiavelli were the political thinkers who came up with different thoughts about the current political systems that were capable of governing nations.
Of the great variety of kinds of argumentation used in the law, some are persuasive rather than strictly logical, and others exemplify different procedures in applied logic rather than the formulas of pure logic.
From that point onward, a more or less continuous history of such reflection can be traced up to the present day. As is true with the history of philosophy more generally, one can observe over the centuries changes not only in the theories set forth but also in the central questions about law that such theories were meant to answer.
Although every philosophical theory is in part a product of the time, place, and culture in which it is developed, the philosophy of law is parochial in an additional sense.
Philosophical speculation about the nature of law not only is very often shaped by the politics of the time and place of a given theorist but is also carried on with a specific sort of legal system and legal culture in view.
September In high school I decided I was going to study philosophy in college. I had several motives, some more honorable than others. One of the less honorable was to shock people. Philosophy of law: Philosophy of law, branch of philosophy that investigates the nature of law, especially in its relation to human values, attitudes, practices, and political communities. Traditionally, philosophy of law proceeds by articulating and defending propositions about law that are general and. 'Isms & 'Ologies: All the Movements, Ideologies and Doctrines That Have Shaped Our World. by: Arthur Goldwag | Philosophy Dictionaries | | Encyclopedias |.
The latter fact is important, as the kinds of legal systems in Europe and the Anglophone world have varied widely through the last several millennia.
Although the shape and structure of those systems cannot be discussed in any detail here, it should nonetheless be noted that a robust understanding of each of the major theories and texts in the history of philosophy of law requires some acquaintance with the legal systems of the cities and states in which a given theory was developed.
As a result, Aristotle theorized about law primarily on the model of general rules of action enacted by legislation and revisable by direct vote or other plebiscitary means. To take a different example, starting in the 17th century many British and later other Anglophone philosophers of Philosophy essay topics argued for the central importance of judicial institutions for the very existence of a legal system and debated the idea of legal reasoning as a distinct sort of deliberative activity.
More recently, increasing attention has been paid to the related question of how the language of the law is to be correctly interpreted. Some theorists, beginning in the early 20th century, even found it fruitful to think about the nature of law primarily from the point of view of legal professionals such as judges or lawyers.
That development is surely to be at least partly explained by the fact that those theorists reflected on law almost exclusively within advanced common law systems—i.
Ancient Greece The abstract concept of law is acknowledged, though not discussed, in the poems of Homer and Hesiod in the 8th—7th century bce. In the Greek histories and literature of the 6th and 5th centuries bce, however, one finds the first articulation of ideas about law that have had enduring influence in the West: They do whatever it bids.
The great dramatist Sophoclesin his tragedy Antigone, first made salient the important idea that the requirements of law and morality may conflict. Out of familial duty, Antigone flouts the order and buries the body, thereby herself risking punishment by death.
The relevant Greek term, nomos, varied widely in meaning across contextsoften referring simply to convention or practice. In his dialogue Crito, Plato fictionally cast his teacher, Socratesimprisoned and sentenced to death for impiety and corrupting the youngas faced with a choice between accepting the death penalty and escaping, thereby disobeying the law.
In the dialogue Socrates makes the provocative argument, on behalf of the laws of Athens, that since he has received the benefits and protections of living under law for his entire life and has never left the city out of protest, he is obligated either to obey its laws or to persuade the state that they should not be enforced against him.
Since he has failed at his trial in the latter task, he must respect the laws by obeying their commands, regardless of their content. Because of its universal nature, a law can sometimes fail to apply, or apply only indeterminately, to a novel case unforeseen by the legislator.
Detail of a Roman copy 2nd century bce of a Greek alabaster portrait bust of Aristotle, c. He shared the common Greek view that, as a general principle, law had a share in eternal divine wisdom. As such, it was an instrument by which to constrain the exercise of political power, particularly that of tyrants, whose policies represented only their own interests and not the good of the community.
The Romans established new legal forms and institutions as well as the first legal professionals and administrators. This practice culminated in the Digest Digestaassembled by the Byzantine emperor Justinian I reigned — cea work that eventually served as the basis of many modern legal systems of western Europe.
But whereas Greek law faded in influence, the Greek legacy in the philosophy of law was to endure for several centuries, extending through the Middle Agesduring which there were many refinements and extensions of Greek themes and ideas, particularly within the Christian tradition.
In his work De republica On the Republiche famously held, echoing Sophocles, that: This more-capacious conception of law set rather strict moral conditions that putative positive human-created law must meet in order to qualify as real law: Natural-law theory was given its first systematic treatment by the great Christian philosopher St.
He claimed, in terms clearer than in previous theories, that law had by nature a distinctive point or purpose.
In the most-abstract sense, the purpose of law is to serve the common good of a political community. More concretely, law is a promulgated plan of coordination whereby a society can realize goods both tangible and intangible that cannot be achieved by other means.
Painting of Thomas Aquinas; attributed to Botticelli, —-- Search for Books in Philosophy Writing Resources--Writing Resources--| Writing Philosophy | Calls For Papers | Writing Papers for Class | Admissions Essays | | Essay Samples | Teaching Writing | Style Books | Writing Tools |-- Calls for papers in Philosophy Everyone has the need to express themselves in some form or another, whether artistically, verbally or through writing.
However, while there are various ways of communicating thoughts and ideas, the most important method is most definitely through verbal communication. arguments or theories in philosophy papers, you must always practice philosophy.
This means that you should have learned about the topic: stick to explaining only the details that are essential to the author’s argument for the particular thesis and to your own argument for. Philosophy essay topics, - Graduate paper writer. We have writers from a wide range of countries, they have various educational backgrounds and work experience.
But the common thing is their high level of language proficiency and academic writing skills. 'Isms & 'Ologies: All the Movements, Ideologies and Doctrines That Have Shaped Our World.
by: Arthur Goldwag | Philosophy Dictionaries | | Encyclopedias |. Essay is a personal point of view of an author on some particular topic. In most cases essay topics are not only tough to be revealed, but also hard to be understood by most of the people.